Vidalytics vs Voomly

The real split: analytics versus cheap hosting

Both of these swap your video player for one that tries to sell. Both autoplay with sound where the browser allows it, drop a call to action at the second you choose, gate part of the video behind an email, and draw a graph of how far people watched. Stand them next to each other on player features and they look interchangeable. They are not, and the difference is not on the player.

Vidalytics is the older, more proven product. Direct-response marketers have run it for years, and its pull is the analytics behind the player: it does not just count views, it tracks conversions and revenue, segments the retention curve into people who bought and people who did not, and runs A/B experiments with a winner recommender. That depth is what a paid-traffic funnel actually needs, and Vidalytics has the public reviews and known DR users to back it.

Voomly comes at the same job from the budget end. From its Plus plan up the bandwidth cap goes away, so a heavily streamed video costs the same flat monthly fee, and it wraps the player in drag-and-drop funnels, an in-video email gate, and a bundled Doodly and Toonly suite. What it does not have is the analytics. Voomly measures attention, not the sale, and its public reputation is dominated by billing and cancellation complaints rather than anything about video.

So the split is this. Vidalytics answers "how do I read and improve what a sales video is doing on paid traffic?" Voomly answers "how do I stream a lot of video cheaply and capture a lead inside it?" One is the analytics-led player with a track record; the other is the low-cost, uncapped host with a trust question over the bill.

Vidalytics: the proven direct-response player

Vidalytics was built for the sales video, and it shows in the analytics. Its player carries the usual conversion furniture, Smart Autoplay, timed CTAs and play gates, exit thumbnails and countdown timers, but the reason marketers keep it is what sits behind that. It draws second-by-second engagement, marks a heatmap of where attention drops, and segments the curve into buyers and non-buyers so you can see how the people who purchased watched differently from the people who left. On top of that it tracks conversions and revenue with cross-domain support, runs A/B experiments with a winner recommender that tells you which variant is ahead, and exposes an API on its top plan.

The proof is the other half of the case. For an English-speaking buyer Vidalytics has the track record its rivals here lack: a 4.9 out of 5 across 28 G2 reviews, and public use by well-known direct-response names. When you are about to point paid traffic at a funnel, being able to read years of outside feedback is worth as much as any single feature.

The cost to plan around is the meter. Vidalytics bills on bandwidth, with an allowance on each tier and $0.33 per gigabyte beyond it, and its terms allow an automatic plan bump when you exceed the limit, so a video that suddenly does volume can nudge the bill up without you touching a setting. Its attribution is also pixel-based rather than server-side: it tracks the conversion in the browser and reports revenue, but it does not post a cart-verified purchase server-to-server onto the play that earned it. For most direct-response funnels the analytics are deep enough; if you specifically need the sale posted back to the ad platform from the cart, note the gap.

Voomly: uncapped bandwidth and a billing caveat

Voomly comes from the team behind Doodly and Toonly, and it is sold as a way to turn any video into a funnel by swapping the player. Drop it in and the video can gate itself behind an email, branch a viewer down a path with surveys and prompts, add chapters, and run ad-free with your own branding on a 4K player. The draw for most people is the bandwidth. From the Plus plan up it is uncapped, so a heavily streamed video costs the same predictable monthly fee. One long-term user on r/Filmmakers who had been paying about $5,000 a year for Vimeo said the switch was worth it for that alone, while noting the product was a bit buggy.

Two things temper the pitch, and the first is serious. Voomly's public reputation is dominated by billing and cancellation complaints, not video problems. Its Trustpilot score sat at 2.9 out of 5 when we checked, with the one-star reviews clustering on being charged after cancelling and a cancel flow that reportedly logs people out before it finishes. If you try it, use a card you can dispute and keep records of every cancellation step. Support is email only, with no phone line, and experiences of it split hard between quick replies and tickets that go unanswered.

The second is analytics, and it is the direct contrast with Vidalytics. Voomly measures attention well through engagement graphs, heatmaps, and geo and device breakdowns, but it stops there. There is no conversion or revenue tracking, no buyers-versus-non-buyers segmentation, and no built-in A/B testing to decide a winner. It also retired its old standalone video player for a templates system, so some older tutorials describe features that have moved. What you get is a cheap, uncapped, lead-capturing host. What you do not get is a way to read which video is doing the selling.

A third option if the video's whole job is the sale: TrackPlay

Both of these will host a sales video and capture a lead inside it, and Vidalytics will even track the conversion. Neither posts a cart-verified purchase server-side onto the exact play that earned it, because Vidalytics tracks in the browser and Voomly stops at engagement. If closing that loop is why you are shopping, a third tool is built around it. TrackPlay is a VSL player and analytics platform for paid-traffic funnels, and its focus is attribution: it ties every second watched to whether the viewer bought, then posts the cart-verified sale back to the ad platform on the play that earned it. Cart postbacks come server to server from seven direct-response carts, including ClickBank, ClickFunnels, Kiwify and Digistore24, and the conversion fires server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4 at the watch-time milestone you set, so the ad platform optimises on the real sale rather than a page-load pixel. It draws retention per second split into buyers versus non-buyers, reports revenue per play, decides split tests on cart-verified sales with real statistics, and bills per play with every feature on every plan.

It is narrow by design, and that is the honest limit. TrackPlay is built for paid-traffic VSL conversion, so it is not a general video host or a B2B content library, and it has none of the channels, SEO pages or webinar tooling of a Wistia. If the video's job is content marketing rather than a direct-response sale, or you need to house a large course catalog, it is the wrong shape and one of these two fits better. That focus is exactly what makes it suit a business built on a single sales video. The other caveat is age: TrackPlay is very new, its testimonials are on its own site, there is little third-party or Reddit track record yet, and signup is invite-only right now. That is what you would expect of a platform this recent, but it means you cannot lean on outside proof before you commit paid traffic, in the way Vidalytics's years of public reviews or even Voomly's blunt Trustpilot record at least give you something to read.

Which one for you

Choose Vidalytics if you run paid traffic to a sales video and want to read what it is doing: conversion and revenue tracking, buyers-versus-non-buyers retention, heatmaps, and A/B experiments with a winner recommender, on a player with a real direct-response track record. You take on a bandwidth meter with $0.33 per gigabyte overage and the possibility of an automatic plan bump on a video that takes off, and the attribution is pixel-based rather than a server-side cart postback, but for reading and improving a paid-traffic funnel it is the stronger pick of the two.

Choose Voomly if you want the lowest-cost way to stream uncapped video with lead capture built into the player, and the bundled Doodly and Toonly suite on the Cloud plan is useful because you also make the videos. Go in with your eyes open on the billing reputation: use a disputable card, keep proof of any cancellation, and accept that the analytics tell you about attention, not about which video sold.

Look at TrackPlay instead if the funnel lives or dies on one sales video on paid ads and you need the cart-verified sale posted back to Meta and TikTok on the play that earned it, on a per-play meter. It is the wrong tool for a content library or a course, but it is the right shape for pure direct-response video.

Pricing, compared

Vidalytics bills on bandwidth. Starter is $19 a month billed annually, or $24 month-to-month, Pro is $63 ($79 monthly), Premium is $119 ($149 monthly), and Enterprise is custom, with a genuine free-forever plan below Starter. Each tier includes a bandwidth allowance, 100 GB on Starter, 200 GB on Pro, 500 GB on Premium, and charges $0.33 per extra gigabyte beyond it. Conversion tracking and heatmaps begin on Pro, and the API arrives on Premium. The sticker is low, but the true cost tracks how much video gets streamed, and the terms allow an automatic plan bump when you pass the limits.

Voomly is priced by plan, and the plan that matters is the one where bandwidth stops being capped. Voomly Light is free for 5 videos with a small bandwidth allowance and one funnel. Basic is $9 a month for 30 videos and 20 GB of storage. Plus is $19 a month, or $16 on annual billing, and is the first tier with uncapped bandwidth, 2 TB of storage and 10 funnels. Cloud is $49 a month, or $41 annually, lifting storage to 7 TB and bundling Doodly, Toonly, Talkia, Pyks and People Builder. Pro is $79 a month, or $66 annually, for 10 TB. There is a 14-day trial that needs a card, and a 30-day money-back guarantee.

In short, both meter differently at the point that matters. Vidalytics charges for the bandwidth a video streams, which is manageable on a controlled funnel and can climb on a hit. Voomly, from Plus up, does not meter bandwidth at all, so a heavily streamed video is a flat fee. If your deciding factor is a predictable bill on high volume, Voomly wins on price; if it is analytics you can act on, the meter on Vidalytics buys you a great deal more. Both ask for a card before the trial, so read the cancellation terms first, especially on Voomly.

Prices checked September 2026. Verify on the vendor site before you buy.